ICU and You · Superquiz · Number 64
Five questions — companion to Mind Map #35, The Adolescent
1A fifteen-year-old with known type 1 diabetes has had no insulin for two days and is drowsy. Glucose 800 mg/dL, pH 6.9, ketones present, sodium 155. One 20 mL/kg bolus has been given. The referring hospital asks whether to start insulin. The most important next step is to:
His corrected sodium is about 166, which is what makes him hyperosmolar — the glucose alone would not tell you. A child with DKA is roughly 7% dehydrated; one in a hyperosmolar state is 12 to 15%, so a single bolus is nowhere near enough. The osmolality is currently holding water inside the vessels, which is why his circulation looks better than his tissues are. Start insulin and the glucose falls, the osmolality falls, and that water leaves the circulation for the tissues where it was always needed — so you can produce shock in a patient who is receiving intravenous fluid. The fluid has to go in before the glucose comes down. Bicarbonate is not the answer to a pH of 6.9 here, and restricting fluid is the instinct this presentation punishes.
See Podcast #59 and Superpuzzle #52.
2A sixteen-year-old cannot be intubated or oxygenated, and you are going to the front of the neck. Which statement is most accurate?
It is the size of the cricothyroid membrane that decides the technique, not the birthday, and by sixteen the technique is the adult one — scalpel, bougie, tube. The equipment is a different question. A CT study of 16 to 19 year olds found cricothyroid membrane heights of 4.6 to 6.2 mm, against the 6.0 mm cuffed tube adult guidance specifies; the authors concluded the standard devices could fail in most of their cohort, and at least one paediatric service specifies a 5.0 tube for teenagers. Carry a range of sizes. Note also that the widely repeated rule that adult technique applies “over the age of eight” is not something any guideline actually says — it is an inference from the gap between the paediatric guidelines, which stop at eight, and the adult ones, which say “adults”.
See Bare Bones No. 2 and Mnemonic #57, ADULT.
3A fifteen-year-old is admitted after a deliberate overdose. Her mother has not left the bedside since arrival. The best approach to taking the history is to:
Two things have to happen, in that order. See her without the parent — ingestion, self-harm and fear are rarely disclosed with a parent in the room, and her account of what happened is often not her mother's account. Then name the limits of confidentiality before she tells you anything, and be concrete about where the line falls: what she smokes at the weekend stays within the treating team, a disclosure that somebody is hurting her does not. The first option is the trap, and it is the one that feels kindest: an unconditional promise of secrecy is one you will have to break, and breaking it costs you every subsequent conversation she has with anybody in a uniform. Deferring to the mental health team is not wrong so much as late — the toxicology is the easy part of this admission.
See Mind Map #35 and Bare Bones No. 2.
4An eighteen-year-old presents with fever and a petechial rash. Her mother confirms she had her school meningococcal vaccination. Which statement is correct?
The dose given through the national programme at fourteen to sixteen is MenACWY. Serogroup B accounted for 84% of Australian cases in both 2023 and 2024, and 96% of cases in the 15 to 19 age band — so a fully immunised adolescent is unprotected against the serogroup most likely to reach you. There is also a second incidence peak in this age group, not just the infant one. Worth knowing where you work: MenB is separately funded for adolescents in Queensland, the Northern Territory and South Australia, and Victoria begins in January 2027, so “not covered” is a statement about the national programme rather than about every Australian teenager.
See Bare Bones No. 2 and Mind Map #35.
5A seventeen-year-old kidney transplant recipient is admitted with acute rejection. He has not taken his tacrolimus for three weeks. Which entry in the notes is most useful?
Recording that the medicine was not taken is a fact and belongs in the notes. Recording that the patient is non-compliant is a theory about a person, and it is the theory that follows him for years. The second option is the only one that names a mechanism you could do something about — and there is a great deal you could do about it. Graft loss peaks between seventeen and twenty-four with no recipient group exempt, and a young man who stops immunosuppression rather than explain his transplant in front of his friends has made a completely intelligible choice with a catastrophic price. “Poor engagement” is the same verdict in a longer coat.
See Aphorism #39 and Mnemonic #57, ADULT.
0 / 5