This set is about the years between puberty and eighteen. The physiology has
finished arguing. What has not is who may consent, who may be told, and what they will admit to
with a parent in the room.
The tiers map roughly onto the three phases of a six-year medical programme — the science,
then the clinical reasoning, then what you will actually be expected to do with your own hands.
Read the one that fits, and glance at the one above it. If you are on a rural clinical school
placement with us, all three are fair game on a ward round.
More of this is about law and conversation than about drugs, deliberately. This is the age group
where the commonest serious errors are not pharmacological.
Tier one
The science of a body that finished before the brain did
Phase 1 — the foundational years, and anything called Beginnings, Growth and Development
Puberty is staged, and on two scales, not oneTanner scores breast or genital
development separately from pubic hair. There is no combined “Tanner 3”, and
discordance is normal and informative — hair running ahead points at adrenal androgens. The
age spread is wide enough that the stage tells you more than the birthday.
The body finishes before the control system doesMaturation is asynchronous: the
reward systems arrive before the prefrontal machinery that moderates them, and that gradient is
part of why this age group takes risks. What is not defensible is the line you will hear
everywhere, that the brain is not developed until twenty-five. There is no switch at twenty-five.
Development is continuous, hugely variable between individuals, and group imaging says nothing
about the patient in front of you.
Airway and circulation are adultThe cords, not the cricoid ring, are the narrowest
point; cuffed tubes, and cuff pressure is measured rather than guessed. Stroke volume is no longer
near-fixed, so output is not rate-dependent. From twelve there is consensus on a mean arterial
pressure of at least 65 — the first agreed number anywhere in this series.
Weight-based dosing becomes the hazard rather than the safeguardAustralian safety
guidance is explicit: above roughly forty to fifty kilograms, do not exceed adult upper dose
limits, and calculating from total body weight can overdose. There is no single cut-off — it
is drug by drug — but a seventy-kilogram sixteen-year-old dosed per kilogram out of habit is
a recognised way to hurt somebody.
Creatinine climbs with muscle, and no eGFR is reported under eighteenAustralian
laboratories do not issue one, because the adult equations are not validated there. So a
creatinine sitting inside the adult range can conceal real impairment in a small adolescent —
and on a long admission, muscle wasting lowers creatinine and flatters kidneys that do not deserve
it.
The growth plates are still openWhich is why a limp or a knee complaint still sends
you to the hip: slipped upper femoral epiphysis belongs to this age band and presents as knee pain
in someone who looks well.
If you take one thing: the body in front of you is adult and the system steering
it is not. Almost everything difficult about this age group follows from that asymmetry.
Likely to be examined as: a short answer on Tanner staging and what it actually
stages, or on why creatinine is a poor guide to renal function across puberty. A good viva opener is
at what weight do you stop dosing per kilogram, and why is that the wrong question?
Tier two
The consultation nobody taught you to have
Phase 2 — the clinical years, integrated clinical studies, and the ICE
Ask the parent to step out, routinelyAustralian paediatric bodies recommend seeing
the adolescent alone for part of every consultation, and none sets a minimum age. Do it as
ordinary practice so it does not read as an accusation: I see everyone your age on their own
for a few minutes. Note where the evidence actually sits — the randomised trial is for
the confidentiality assurance, which lifted willingness to disclose from 39 to 47 per cent
and willingness to return from 53 to 67. That the room should be empty is consensus, and
sound, but it is consensus.
Say what confidentiality covers before you startNever promise the unconditional
version. The NSW formulation has four exceptions and fits in one breath: if you intend to harm
yourself, if you intend to harm someone else, if someone is harming you, or if you know of someone
else at risk. Then — everything else stays between us. Saying it first is part of
the method, not a disclaimer bolted on.
HEEADSSS, and the version to useHome, Education and employment, Eating, Activities,
Drugs, Sexuality, Suicide and depression, Safety. The current form is HEEADSSS 3.0 (2014), whose
addition is online life threaded through every domain rather than parked in a letter of its own.
Two honesties: it has never been validated and is a consensus framework rather than an instrument,
and the Spirituality and Strengths appended locally are not part of the published
acronym.
Consent: what the New South Wales law actually saysYou will be taught that section
49 of the Minors (Property and Contracts) Act 1970 lets a fourteen-year-old consent. It
does not say that. It shields the practitioner from a claim in assault or battery, says nothing
about negligence, gives the young person no priority over a parent, and expressly preserves the
common law. Capacity comes from the common law — Gillick, received here in
Marion’s case in 1992 — and that test is decision-specific, not age-specific:
a graze needs less maturity than starting contraception. NSW has no statutory presumption at
sixteen. South Australia is the national exception, with statutory adult-equivalent consent at
sixteen.
Refusal is not consent in reverseThe crude version — they can consent but
cannot refuse — survives neither the NSW Health manual, which says a minor with capacity may
refuse, nor the judgments. A competent adolescent’s refusal is legally real and must be taken
seriously, but it stays subject to the court’s parens patriae jurisdiction in a way
an adult’s does not. In H v AC (2024) the court found a seventeen-year-old Gillick
competent and authorised treatment anyway.
Mandatory reporting: know where the line fallsIn NSW the statutory duty attaches to
a child, defined as under sixteen. For a sixteen- or seventeen-year-old, reporting is
permitted and often right but not mandatory under that section — the opposite of what most
people assume on an adolescent ward. As a student your position is simpler: take any suspicion
straight to your supervisor, who is unambiguously a mandatory reporter. You do not discharge a
concern by deciding alone that no duty applied.
Ask about self-harm directly, privately, more than onceIndirect questions get
indirect answers. Ask in the room you cleared, in plain words, and ask again later if the first
answer arrived too quickly.
If you take one thing: the examination is the easy part of an adolescent
consultation. Almost everything that matters is decided before it — by whether you got the room
right, and whether you said what you would and would not keep to yourself.
Likely to be examined as: a long case or OSCE where the marks sit in the
approach rather than the findings — whether you ask the parent out, whether you set out the
limits of confidentiality unprompted, whether you address the young person rather than across them.
A favourite viva: this fifteen-year-old refuses the operation — what now?
Tier three
What you will be expected to do
Phase 3 — the final clinical years, the pre-internship term, and your first nights on call
For resuscitation, the Australian rule is not the American oneYou will read that a
child becomes an adult at the signs of puberty. That is the American Heart Association. ANZCOR
defines a child as up to the eighteenth birthday, with the rider that if the patient appears to be
an adult you use adult guidelines. The paediatric numbers hold while you are on them: four joules
per kilogram for every shock, adrenaline ten micrograms per kilogram to a maximum single dose of
one milligram.
Ketoacidosis: the adolescent risk is recurrence, not cerebral oedemaMost episodes in
established type 1 diabetes follow omitted or interrupted insulin, and deliberate omission is a
recognised event rather than a lapse — so the admission has a conversation in it, not just a
fluid order. Cerebral injury complicates well under one per cent of episodes and kills about a
fifth of those, but the risk is weighted towards younger children; teaching it as the
adolescent hazard is a common inversion. About a third of Australian children still present in
ketoacidosis at diagnosis.
Anaphylaxis: the peak-risk group for fatal food reactionsLay them flat and do not
let them stand or walk — that is what kills. Intramuscular adrenaline, 0.01 mL/kg of 1:1000
to a maximum of 0.5 mL, repeated after five minutes if the response is inadequate. An adolescent
carries a 300 microgram device, with a 500 microgram option from fifty kilograms, and intranasal
adrenaline is now registered here alongside the injectors. The bands were revised in 2026 —
read the current ASCIA chart, not the one you memorised.
Meningococcus: the funded vaccine misses the common oneMenACWY is on the National
Immunisation Program at fourteen to sixteen, usually through school. Serogroup B causes the large
majority of Australian notifications and is not nationally funded for healthy adolescents
— only South Australia and Queensland fund it. So “fully vaccinated” in a sick
sixteen-year-old with a rash excludes much less than it sounds like.
Deliberate self-poisoning is an admission category of its ownAustralian intensive
care units took 813 admissions of twelve to seventeen-year-olds for deliberate self-harm between
2015 and 2021, around two-thirds of them girls, and the monthly rate rose after March 2020. Each
needs a mental health assessment, not merely a drug level, and it belongs to the admission rather
than to the discharge.
Injury is what kills themInjury accounts for roughly three-quarters of deaths
between fifteen and twenty-four; suicide is the single leading cause at about a third. Keep those
apart — you will hear the three-quarters attached to suicide, and it belongs to injury as a
whole. On the ward: they compensate well and then do not, so a normal blood pressure in a bleeding
adolescent describes their physiology, not their blood volume.
Testicular torsion, and the sign that points the wrong wayPeak incidence runs right
through this age band, and salvage falls from about ninety per cent inside six hours to about
twenty by twenty-four. Two traps: relief on elevating the testis — Prehn’s sign —
was present in the large majority of proven torsions, so the classic teaching is
backwards; and a normal Doppler does not exclude it. It also presents as lower abdominal pain in
someone nobody has examined below the waist.
Know where they go, and call earlyAdolescents fall down a gap in the Australian data
— the adult registry excludes under-sixteens, the paediatric one thins out above fifteen,
and no national ranking of adolescent admissions has been published. The gap exists in the
buildings too: whether your fifteen-year-old goes to an adult unit, a children’s unit or a
retrieval depends on where you are standing. In New South Wales, NETS is 1300 36 2500.
If you take one thing: the error at your stage is treating them as a large child
or a small adult. They are neither, and in this age group the traps are as often legal and
conversational as they are pharmacological.
Likely to be examined as: an OSCE on the adolescent consultation, a viva on
consent and capacity, or a resuscitation scenario where what the examiner really wants to know is
whether you reach for paediatric or adult numbers, and whether you can say why.
And one for you. Medical students are not exempt from
anything on this page. If this material lands closer to home than it should, Doctors’ Health
NSW runs a confidential peer-support line for doctors and students on 02 9437 6552, and Lifeline is
13 11 14.
Over to you
Which tier did you read — and what were you taught that this page contradicts?
Tell me your year, which tier fitted, and what was missing, too basic or too advanced. That part is
the same every time, and it is how these get better.
This one has a second question I would particularly like answered. Several things here are taught
the other way round in perfectly good medical schools: that section 49 lets a fourteen-year-old
consent, that a child becomes an adult at the signs of puberty, that adolescents are the high-risk
group for cerebral oedema, that Prehn’s sign tells you something. Which of them were
you taught? No names and no universities — I want to know which survive into
practice, and a few dozen replies would tell me something I cannot find out any other way.
And if a topic is giving you trouble, say so and I will build the next one around it.
How you are credited is entirely your call — by name, by initials, or not at all — whether you write the piece or I do, and whether I quote you or simply say who sent something in; nothing of yours goes up with your name on it unless you have said yes.
The button opens a reply straight to me. If your device blocks it, write to
icuandyou@icloud.com instead.