←  Home All drug profiles All on this topic

ICU and You  ·  Drugstore  ·  Number 2

Paracetamol in children

The drug everyone thinks they know, and the one that still kills people

About this series

Drugstore is for drug profiles. Each one runs the same way: the few things that matter most, then the practical business of doses, routes and the errors that recur, and then the pharmacology proper — kinetics, dynamics, indications and adverse effects.

The intention is to serve two readers at once. The clinician who needs the drug at three in the morning, and the First Part candidate who has to explain its metabolism. Those are different needs, and most references choose one.

This one is paracetamol as it is used in children: the doses and where they differ, the specific errors that keep recurring, what to do about an overdose, and the pharmacology underneath it. Almost everything here is more interesting than the drug's reputation suggests.

Four things, if you take nothing else

  1. It is the most useful drug on the ward and the most casually prescribed. Regular paracetamol reduces opioid requirement, works, and is almost free. It is also written up without a weight, continued for a fortnight, and duplicated inside a combination product. The harm it does is almost never from a single wrong dose.
  2. The child at risk in your unit is not the overdose. It is the child on regular therapeutic paracetamol who has stopped eating, is vomiting, is septic, or is on an enzyme inducer. Prolonged fasting and malnutrition deplete glutathione and shift metabolism towards the toxic pathway. The dose did not change; the child did.
  3. Two strengths of the intravenous formulation, one concentration, and a recurring tenfold error. Intravenous paracetamol is 10 mg/mL, supplied as 500 mg in 50 mL and 1,000 mg in 100 mL. Confusing milligrams with millilitres gives exactly ten times the intended dose, and this has killed infants. Over two hundred inadvertent overdoses were reported to the UK national reporting system in one period.
  4. A child under 10 kg is not just a smaller child. The product information specifies a lower intravenous dose below 10 kg — 7.5 mg/kg rather than 15 — and a lower daily maximum. Writing the standard dose for a 9 kg infant is a doubling, not a rounding.

The practical part

SituationDoseNotes
Oral or rectal
child
15 mg/kg every four to six hours
maximum 60 mg/kg/day
Round to a sensible volume of the strength you actually have. Rectal absorption is slower and less predictable than oral, so it is a fallback rather than an equivalent.
Intravenous
over 10 kg
15 mg/kg every six hours
maximum 60 mg/kg/day
Solution is 10 mg/mL. Always prescribe in milligrams, never millilitres.
Intravenous
10 kg or less
7.5 mg/kg every six hours
maximum 30 mg/kg/day
A different dose and a different ceiling. This is the one people get wrong.
Duration at maximum dose Review by 48 to 72 hours Particularly in the small, unwell, fasting or malnourished child. Maximum dosing was never intended to be open-ended.

Every one of these must be checked against your own formulary and local guideline before use. They are here to be recognised, not copied.

The errors that actually happen

Milligrams read as millilitres. The single commonest serious paracetamol error in paediatrics, and the reason every liquid and intravenous prescription should state the dose in milligrams.

The hidden second source. Combination cold and flu preparations, some over-the-counter analgesics, and what the parents have already given at home. Ask what they have had in the last six to eight hours before you write anything.

Dosing by age rather than weight. Body habitus varies enormously by school age. Use the weight, and in the obese child use a sensible lean estimate rather than the scale reading.

Modified-release preparations in children. Avoid them. They behave differently in overdose, the nomogram does not apply, and there is no good reason to use one in a child.

The prescription nobody reviews. Written on day one for a painful procedure, still running on day twelve in a child who is now septic and not eating.

When it is an overdose

This is the commonest deliberate ingestion at school age and in adolescence, and it is also the most forgiving if you catch it. Accidental liquid ingestion in the younger child is common and rarely needs treatment.

The counterintuitive bit, and its exception

Young children tolerate an acute paracetamol load relatively well. Sulfation, rather than glucuronidation, is the dominant conjugation pathway in early childhood, and it has spare capacity — so proportionally less paracetamol is pushed down the oxidative route that produces the toxic metabolite. Most accidental paediatric liquid ingestions never need acetylcysteine.

But that protection is conditional, and the condition is nutrition. A published Australian case describes a previously well three-year-old who developed hepatotoxicity after an accidental liquid ingestion, in the setting of a recent viral illness and poor oral intake — with a metabolite profile showing a greater proportion had gone down the oxidative pathway.

The reassuring generalisation and the dangerous exception are the same physiology.

The pharmacology

What it does, and the honest answer. Nobody is entirely sure. It is an analgesic and antipyretic with almost no peripheral anti-inflammatory action, which is why it is not classed as a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory. The leading explanations are central cyclo-oxygenase inhibition in an environment of low peroxide tone, an active metabolite acting on vanilloid and cannabinoid receptors, and augmentation of descending serotonergic inhibition. Being asked to explain a mechanism that is not settled is itself a fair exam question.

Kinetics. Oral bioavailability is good but incomplete, with peak concentrations in roughly thirty to sixty minutes for a liquid and longer for tablets. Volume of distribution is close to total body water, protein binding is low, and the elimination half-life is two to three hours — prolonged in overdose and in liver failure, where a rising half-life is a bad sign.

Metabolism, which is the whole of the toxicology. About ninety per cent is conjugated to inactive glucuronide and sulfate and excreted. A small fraction is oxidised by cytochrome P450, chiefly CYP2E1, to NAPQI — which is rapidly conjugated by glutathione and rendered harmless.

In overdose, or in a child whose glutathione is already depleted, that last step fails. Free NAPQI binds covalently to hepatocyte proteins and produces centrilobular necrosis. Acetylcysteine works by replenishing glutathione, which is why it is effective early and progressively less so late.

Adverse effects. At therapeutic doses, remarkably few — which is most of why it is prescribed so casually. Hepatotoxicity is the one that matters. Rare severe cutaneous reactions are described. The reported association with childhood asthma is confounded by indication and should be treated as unresolved rather than as established.

Interactions worth knowing. Enzyme inducers — carbamazepine, phenytoin, rifampicin, isoniazid, and chronic alcohol — increase flux through the oxidative pathway and lower the threshold for harm. Regular therapeutic paracetamol raises the INR in a patient on warfarin, which surprises people every time.

For the First Part

The predictable asks: draw the metabolic pathways with approximate proportions and name the enzymes; explain the formation and fate of NAPQI and the mechanism of acetylcysteine; explain why paracetamol is not a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory; account for the effect of fasting, malnutrition and enzyme induction on toxicity; and explain why the nomogram cannot be read before four hours.

The structure that collects marks: classify (analgesic and antipyretic, non-opioid, not an NSAID), then pharmaceutics (oral, rectal and intravenous, and the 10 mg/mL solution), then kinetics, then dynamics, then toxicity, then the clinical turn — with values and units wherever you can give them.

Challenge for you

When did you last stop a regular paracetamol prescription?

Starting it is automatic. Stopping it is nobody's job, and that is how a child ends up on maximum dosing for a fortnight while their oral intake quietly fails. Tell me whether your unit reviews it at all, who does, and what would have to change — and, if you have one, the paracetamol error you have seen or nearly made.

Send your answer

The button opens a reply straight to me. If your device blocks it, write to icuandyou@icloud.com instead.